On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 02:11:36AM -0500, Jim Ursetto wrote: > On Mar 15, 2011, at 12:55 AM, John Gabriele wrote: > > > My point was that, if you tell prospective egg contributors that they > > can optionally supply their own html docs, they can use whatever tools > > they want to generate that html (even write it by-hand, if they like). > > [...] you could offer them the option of just providing their > > own raw html and you could install it and host it for them at > > something like http://eggdocs.call-cc.org/package-name. > > Sounds like a huge *dis*advantage to me.
+1 This would be identical to reverting to the situation of 4 years ago where we had a huge mess of completely differently-formatted and not properly maintained HTML egg documentation. *not* an improvement! Cheers, Peter -- http://sjamaan.ath.cx -- "The process of preparing programs for a digital computer is especially attractive, not only because it can be economically and scientifically rewarding, but also because it can be an aesthetic experience much like composing poetry or music." -- Donald Knuth _______________________________________________ Chicken-hackers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
