> Hello, Hi!
> > just a small remark about the syntax: I find this use of keywords > rather unintuitive. I would either expect to be able to write > something like this: > > (module foo (bar baz #:interface ARITHMETIC boing) ...) > > Or something like this: > > (module foo (bar baz (interface ARITHMETIC) boing) ...) > > But a keyword in operator position is unusual and looks rather strange > to me. The problem is that the latter example is ambiguous - it is the same as exporting a macro "interface" that implicitly exports the binding "ARITHMETIC". The former example doesn't also looks confusing to me, but that is more a matter of taste. The use of a keyword is indeed not everybodies taste, but I couldn't come up with a better syntax that is both unambiguous and obvious. cheers, felix _______________________________________________ Chicken-hackers mailing list Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
