On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 10:10:14PM +0200, Christian Kellermann wrote: > * Alan Post <[email protected]> [110928 19:32]: > > I can't see buffer2 being deallocated. Is there a free() missing > > here? > > Thanks Alan, I have missed this indeed. As this is only for the > situations where the name of the file exceeds our famous buffer, > this would just have sometimes leaked memory, hence we also only > free it if buffer2 differs from buffer after that part. Does this > make sense? > > Also can someone confirm that access is part of the POSIX standard > that windows supports? Mr. Cowan maybe? > > Please find the updated patch attached. > > Thank you! > > Christian >
I now notice that barf says "stat" on an OOM error. Excuse my nitpicking, but should that be "access"? -Alan -- .i ma'a lo bradi cu penmi gi'e du _______________________________________________ Chicken-hackers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
