* Alan Post <[email protected]> [111004 14:50]: > I agree, this patch is now fine. I wanted to walk myself through a > mental error I made checking it: > > fifo? returns 0 on ENONENT, whereas file-exists? return #f. This at > first concerned me, as it was inconsistent. It was then I realized > that throwing an error on an existence test for the non-existence of > a file clearly doesn't make sense, but asking the question "is this > path a fifo?" could quite justifiably return "this is not a path." > > Having cleared that confusion up in my head, please do commit this > patch.
Thank you gentlemen, the patch is finally in :) -- Who can (make) the muddy water (clear)? Let it be still, and it will gradually become clear. Who can secure the condition of rest? Let movement go on, and the condition of rest will gradually arise. -- Lao Tse. _______________________________________________ Chicken-hackers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
