On Feb 15 2012, Moritz Heidkamp wrote:
Hi Jörg,
Jörg F. Wittenberger <joerg.wittenber...@softeyes.net> writes:
I rather loved to think instead of "inserting the (*single*)
value of the expression into the next expression" of something
along the lines of physical wires:
connect (pass) all the result(s) of the first expression into the next
(which would then need to accept as many values as the stage
before returns.
if I understand you correctly, this is exactly what the starred
versions, `->*' and `->>*', do. Or did I get you wrong?
Not at all! It's been me, who missed this second form.
It is the form I meant to suggest.
_______________________________________________
Chicken-hackers mailing list
Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
