* Moritz Heidkamp <[email protected]> [130221 17:49]: > Christian Kellermann <[email protected]> writes: > > Probably android for both, since android does not come with all > > posix things. pthreads for example. > > That's not quite true, is it? See > https://android.googlesource.com/platform/prebuilts/ndk/+/master/8/platforms/android-9/arch-arm/usr/include/pthread.h
Ah the NDK... > I vote for software-type unix, too, although it is unclear to me what > this actually means :-) POSIX compliance can't be sufficient factor as > Windows has that, too. Unix [tm] can't be as well as that would > disqualify Linux. Ok, instead of doing further guesswork, I checked the source. Well the software type is used to branch off to do system dependend things in csc (generate a manifest for windows), in eval.scm to do the windows dll loading dance. So if you want to support android and will do different things while compiling (providing a correct manifest etc.) having a distinct 'android type still makes more sense to me than declaring it all unix. Android is definitely not unix at all. Cheers, Christian -- In the world, there is nothing more submissive and weak than water. Yet for attacking that which is hard and strong, nothing can surpass it. --- Lao Tzu _______________________________________________ Chicken-hackers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
