If this patch was acceptable, could someone please apply it? Thanks. Jim
On Feb 19, 2013, at 9:45 AM, Jim Ursetto wrote: > No, it returns 0 to indicate that zero seconds of sleep time remain (it was > not interrupted), just like posix sleep. See the UNIX code, the Windows code > prior to the regression, sleep(3), and the chicken docs. > Jim > > On Feb 19, 2013, at 4:34, Peter Bex <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 02:03:44AM -0600, Jim Ursetto wrote: >>> sleep accepts any type arg but should accept only fixnums; also fix a >>> regression in be44f5328. >> >> Shouldn't it return undefined rather than 0? This seems like a bug in >> the original implementation. >> >> Cheers, >> Peter >> -- >> http://www.more-magic.net >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Chicken-hackers mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers _______________________________________________ Chicken-hackers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
