Am 02.11.2013 23:49, schrieb Evan Hanson:
On 2013-11-02 21:10, "Jörg F. Wittenberger" wrote:
deconstructing the zero-value case as a special case but handling the
one-valued case using the generic multiple value procedure C_values,
which is according to my understanding less efficient - hence it would
have been better to handle the one-value case special...
FWIW, that was purely to allow checking for forced values without
incurring the cost of `list?`. It might be good to add a special case
for single values, too; that was just more code, so I didn't.
I don't have an opinion on the question of threads, but do think
supporting MVs "properly" (i.e. without pushing it onto the user) is a
Good Thing.
Me too thinks so.
Evan
_______________________________________________
Chicken-hackers mailing list
Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
_______________________________________________
Chicken-hackers mailing list
Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
