Do you mean, why isn't it in the README for Chicken? I think it is a recent change, prior to XCode 5 AFAIK the shims were always installed in /usr/bin automatically. I thought that was still the case but it may have changed in OS X 10.9. Yes, install_name_tool etc. are part of this. See the FILES section at the bottom of xcode-select(1).
Try it out and if it works, we can add it to the README. I can't try it because I already have all the shims in /usr/bin. I am using 10.9 and XCode 5.0.2 but just upgraded to those recently. I may have had to run xcode-select to get homebrew to run, I can't remember. Jim On Jan 28, 2014, at 1:03 PM, Felix Winkelmann <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Jim Ursetto <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] fix Mac OS X build > Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 12:02:42 -0600 > >> For the path -- actually, the build tools should be in /usr/bin, and if they >> are not, you just have to run `xcode-select --switch >> /Applications/XCode.app`. This should install the shims into /usr/bin -- at >> least that's my understanding. You can also use `xcrun` to run command-line >> tools associated with the currently selected XCode, but generally, they >> should be available already as shims in /usr/bin. If this is correct, I >> would rather use Apple's official method of switching between command-line >> tools than hardcode it into Chicken's makefiles. > > Then why isn't this in the README? Does the "shims" include install_name_tool > and ar and everything, or just gcc? > > > felix _______________________________________________ Chicken-hackers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
