From: Evan Hanson <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] library unit restructuring Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2014 14:29:46 -0700
> Hi Felix, > > I don't have a substantive reply just ATM, but I have also put some > ideas and tagged some identifiers with where they might go in a > reogranization at: http://wiki.call-cc.org/core-libraries-reorganization Ah, very good. A nice list. I like the simple generic names "string", "list". It would be nice to have some hierarchical naming for core modules, what do you think about "chicken.string", "chicken.list" etc. (even though I prefer the plural form, that is, "strings")? In R7RS that would map to "(chicken string)" and so on. I can't remember whether we have considered "list"-syntax for module names yet. Should that be added? There is some ambiguity with that, when import-modifiers come into play... felix _______________________________________________ Chicken-hackers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
