On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 06:33:45PM +1200, Evan Hanson wrote:
> Due to an off-by-one, the special-cased scrutiny for `list-tail` fails
> when the index argument is equal to the length of the list, giving a
> (list-of ...) as the result type rather than null. While that isn't
> technically incorrect, it also isn't as accurate as possible; this patch
> fixes this case.

Good catch, thanks!  Pushed.

Cheers,
Peter
-- 
http://www.more-magic.net

_______________________________________________
Chicken-hackers mailing list
Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers

Reply via email to