> Now, if you look at the patch you'll see that it changes irregex-core.scm, > which means it creates a "fork" against that part of the code in upstream. > I don't see a way to declare the type from the "outside", in irregex.scm, > unless we also copy that code body as a macro, but that feels really ugly > and will cause some code duplication in the resulting C code.
I suggest creating a wrapper macro for "assume" with an (empty) cond-expand'ed default definition and send this to upstream. If this change has such an impact, then other implementations might take advantage from type-declarations as well. felix _______________________________________________ Chicken-hackers mailing list Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
