On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 10:58:28PM +1200, Evan Hanson wrote: > On 2016-09-10 12:41, Peter Bex wrote: > > Looks good to me, except for one thing: changing the signature of > > C_stack_overflow(). This should be avoided in master, because who > > knows what eggs rely on this function's signature. > > Good point -- here's an updated version for master that adds a > "_with_loc" variant instead, like you suggest.
Looks good to me, feel free to apply it. Cheers, Peter
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Chicken-hackers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
