On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 03:14:12PM +0100, Peter Bex wrote: > The Linux kernel fixed this by using foo[0], instead. Using a flexible > array in all cases (thus requiring C99) seems much saner to me. >
Also, apparently our foo[1] hack is somewhat notorious: http://c-faq.com/struct/structhack.html Cheers, Peter
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Chicken-hackers mailing list Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
