Hey Peter, On 2017-06-06 22:31, Peter Bex wrote: > I noticed two problems after looking over the file-modification-time > patches I recently submitted. [...] Attached are patches for this.
Seems sound, pushed. > Strictly speaking, I suppose we should really add a new C_num_to_size_t > or such, but if we do that, we will need to add it for every stupid > opaque type that C might offer. In practice, size_t is at most 64 bits > so let's just keep that assumption (for now?). Agreed, let's only chase these vapours when it's really necessary. Evan
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Chicken-hackers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
