> On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 07:21:30PM +0200, [email protected] wrote: > > > I'd also like to hear what the other core members think. > > > > (chicken syntax), and keep expand.scm. Don't overdo it. > > Do you mean we rename (chicken expand) to (chicken syntax) in > expand.scm (with perhaps the other macros in (chicken base), > or we keep (chicken expand) and move the other macros into > (chicken syntax)?
You know what? I don't know. I just realize that too many things are changing too much, at too fast a rate. So much that I'm now totally confused, which is an indication that perhaps this might be getting out of hand... :-) As a minimal suggestion, let's try to keep filenames as they are and only change to exported interfaces and module names. Internal reorganizations can be done later. felix _______________________________________________ Chicken-hackers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
