Hey megane, I like the idea here.
I think we'll want to use a different syntax, one that's hash-table specific, similarly to how some other object types (conditions, threads, some others) have their own types but rewrite to structs behind the scenes. Even just dropping the `struct' and using `(hash-table ...)' instead might work. Otherwise, we preclude further extensions to the generic struct type syntax. I'm opening a ticket to keep track of this idea, to which I'll add your patch. Thanks for the prototype. Cheers, Evan _______________________________________________ Chicken-hackers mailing list Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
