Hi all, I was just moving things around in the CHICKEN 5 manual, and ran into "require-extension-for-syntax". I thought we had removed it and require-extension, but apparently both are part of the (chicken base) module.
I'm not sure why we still need these (probably because require-extension is a SRFI (55)?). In any case, shouldn't require-extension-for-syntax be moved to (chicken syntax) for consistency? We have begin-for-syntax and define-for-syntax in there, as well as import-for-syntax. It only makes sense to have require-for-syntax in there as well. But honestly, I think it's better to just drop require-extension-for-syntax and perhaps even require-extension. One more question: Where should we document "the initial (nameless) macro environment"? For example, cond-expand and module and such need a place to be documented too, and they're strictly speaking not part of a module (but it's weird to have to look them up somewhere completely different). OK, one more question and then I'll stop :) What about this note in expand.som: ;; TODO: Eventually, cond-expand should move to the ;; (chicken base) module to match r7rs. Keeping it in the initial env ;; makes it a whole lot easier to write portable CHICKEN 4 & 5 code. Cheers, Peter
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Chicken-hackers mailing list Chickenemail@example.com https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers