Evan Hanson <[email protected]> writes:
> Cool, here is a signed off copy. But, I made some small changes, so if you > or another hacker could have a look just to make sure you're OK with > it? Looks good, pushed! > > I fixed two places where the `resolve-variable` procedure didn't have the new > `outer-ln` argument passed through, Yikes, good catch! (Maybe there was a warning, but I didn't look for one.) > But, I also capitalised the output messages to match the style in > scrutinizer.scm and it now looks like the below when suggesting things, these > are stylistic changes so I didn't want to push them directly, someone else can > have a look and do that: Yes, that's better for me. Thanks.
