Hi everyone, I know I haven’t been vocal or active at all really these last few years so please feel free to disregard my input.

On 2/9/26 20:39, Rolando Abarca via Chicken-hackers wrote:
On the broader topic of LLM-assisted contributions: I work in BigTech, and I can tell you things are moving faster than most people outside these environments would expect. AI-assisted development is becoming the norm, not the exception. I think the CHICKEN community (and really, any open source project) will need to figure out how to handle this sooner rather than later.

One idea: what if there was a way for agents to self-check contributions before submission? Something like a CONTRIBUTING_AI.md or similar document that outlines the specific code quality concerns, style expectations, and common pitfalls. An agent could review the PR against those criteria before a human even sees it. This wouldn't replace human review, but it could raise the quality bar and focus reviewer attention on what matters most.

Putting aside any ethical concern (and I’m not saying we should! it’s just for the sake of the argument), I think there is one crucial thing missing from that reasoning. Most people work on open-source projects on their free time for the fun of it, and from what I’ve seen, to escape the madness of their regular programming job.

Things in the open-source world are mostly voluntary unpaid work. What you propose is to increase the burden on them, with usually low quality code review, which is not why people work on these projects in the first place.

That said, if the community isn't ready to tackle this now, I completely understand. This work isn't blocking anything critical. It started as a personal exploration to learn CHICKEN's internals, and it served that purpose well. But if there's interest, it could also be an opportunity to start thinking through how the project handles this new wave of contributions.

What I see is that you robbed yourself of learning with this amazing community. Everyone here is super nice and great programmers with a lot of detailed knowledge, I would not hesitate to say that it’s the place where I learned the most. Your exploration would have been more rewarding, more correct and deeper, had you learned with the people that actually know how things work and why things are the way they are.


On a personal note, I have a really bitter taste in my mouth regarding LLM, as the scrapers are the reason why I had to shut down my code repository containing all my CHICKEN code.


Reply via email to