On 5/5/05, Graham Fawcett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is there any reason why (usleep) is not included in the standard > library? (Or, why sleep couldn't handle a non-integral argument, like > (sleep 0.5))? >
`sleep' is a direct alias for the sleep(3) call. And usleep isn't POSIX. (That doesn't mean that your suggestion wouldn't be useful - as you said, it would be easy to add, but one has to draw a line somewhere...;-) Usually I use `thread-sleep!' cheers, felix _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
