Hey. > Maybe there's some Chicken magic to support this, but I imagine that > you would have to handle it as you would in C: pass in a pointer to an > array or struct in which the foreign function can store the results; > and have the function return 0 or an error code (or in the case of an > array , perhaps the number of elements written to the array).
Yes, this is kinda what I'm doing right now: I have the Chicken function build a list with all the values and return it. I am just wondering if its possible to do away with this. Thanks, though. :) Alejo. http://bachue.com/alejo ---=( Comunidad de Usuarios de Software Libre en Colombia )=--- ---=( http://bachue.com/colibri )=--=( [EMAIL PROTECTED] )=--- _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
