On 5/20/05, felix winkelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
<snip virtues of require-extension>
So you are saying there no good use cases for require? Then you should say
in the manual that require is deprecated and it is there only for
backward compatibility. Idem for require-for-syntax if
require-extension can do its job.
Or there are issues if the library is not packaged as an egg?
I am still a bit confused about that.
Michele Simionato
_______________________________________________
Chicken-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
