On 5/25/05, Michele Simionato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 5/25/05, felix winkelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I would recommend to use spiffy instead iof the raw http extension. > > Ack! Shame on me for not checking out spiffy! BTW, could you add a line > just after the http-server example telling people that they may want > to use spiffy instead? I assume there are people in the world > that, looking for an http server in Chicken, would first check for > "http-server" instead that for something called "spiffy" ;) >
Hm... You have a point there... :-) cheers, felix _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
