On 5/25/05, Michele Simionato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think to get a remote REPL is not difficult, but I have serious doubts > about getting better tracebacks, since I have never seen a Scheme > implementation with good error reporting :-( > > Guido van Rossum says that he will never make Python tail recursive > since it does not want to lose nice tracebacks. I don't know if it is > technically > possible to get both tail recursion and nice tracebacks, and how difficult > it is.
I feared that might be the case. Still, any tool that could instrument my code to provide some kind of "this source-snippet is probably the problem" report would be beneficial. Maybe I need to do some reading on Scheme debuggers... > > Heck -- if we can throw in a consistent DB API, a MySQL egg, a few > > handy webapp framework components, and a good tutorial, then you've > > got a serious contender in the silent masses' quest for the ideal LAMP > > (LAMS?) framework. (Well, maybe, if the silent masses can learn to > > digest parentheses.) > > > > Well, this is called being optimistic! ;-) I know, but Fortune favours the bold! I never saw Ruby on Rails coming, why not Chicken on Road? (Except that it would be impossible to google. :-) -- Graham _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
