On Sun, May 29, 2005 at 03:54:43AM -0400, Michele Simionato wrote: > > One issue is that of course, the compiled version should have this data > > removed. I'm not sure if currently all extended procedure data is removed > > or not. > > Why do you say so? I have compiled the examples shown before, and it works > just > fine. Have you reasons to believe that procedure data behaves > differently in compiled code?
No, I don't. I meant that this information is most useful in the interpreter, when you're not sure about a function's signature. In compiled code the signature will rarely be requested and they'll only sit there eating memory, so IMHO it's better to remove this extended info by default. Regards, Peter -- http://www.student.kun.nl/peter.bex -- "The process of preparing programs for a digital computer is especially attractive, not only because it can be economically and scientifically rewarding, but also because it can be an aesthetic experience much like composing poetry or music." -- Donald Knuth
pgpdgBCwztR0S.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
