On 5/31/05, Ed Watkeys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > All this talk of Chicken's differing behaviors when interpeting vs. > compiling code has gotten me thinking. Who here uses compiled code > and who here simply uses the interpreter? My work follows a rough > 90/10 split: I never bother compiling the vast majority of the code I > execute with Chicken. > > For my needs, performance is nearly always Good Enough when > interpreted, and if it's not, I think about data structure and > algorithmic changes before considering compiling. >
Since I do a lot of C/C++ glue coding, I compile a lot. But testing is nearly always done in csi. I, too, found csi's performance acceptable for daily tasks (but in the end I don't think performance matters that much nowadays). So I compile the interface code into a .so and do all the rest via csi scripts. cheers, felix _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
