On 6/6/05, Zbigniew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > args-fold is a neat design, but it can be somewhat complicated (and > tedious) to use. I figure most people will write support code to make > it easier. Unfortunately I could not find any, so at the risk of > reinventing the wheel I wrote my own.
Well, I always tend to forget the correct order of arguments for the options and args-fold procedures. So I find your wrapper highly interesting. > I would expect this design to evolve as I use it more. There are > things I am not that happy with. So suggest away. > > Would it make sense to make this or a derivative into an egg? Sure. cheers, felix _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
