Thanks, I will apply the fixes ASAP.
cheers, felix On 8/3/05, Dale Jordan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have found a couple of problems with the simple-macros extension: > > - The definitions of "include" and "define-macro" in > chicken-macros-module.scm need to have their argument changed from > "form" to "(form)" in line with the change referred to on the srfi-72 > discussion list. > > - I found it useful to add "##sys#setslot" to the chicken-internals > module export list defined in simple-macros.scm. > > Michele Simionato reports: > > ,x does not work in the REPL; > > I haven't seen this and have it used it extensively. (I have the debug > extension loaded. I recompiled it for 2.0, but I don't know if this is > related.) > > There are a few things with this macro system I don't yet understand, > but I have to say that it makes writing macros fun again! I really like > it. Thanks, felix for putting it up so quickly. > > Cheerfully. > Dale > > > > _______________________________________________ > Chicken-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users > _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
