Alex Shinn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Now not only can you write portable code, you can share it easily with
> your friends!
>
> http://synthcode.com/scheme/common-scheme/
This looks like a very nice idea, but I wonder why you don't put it
through the SRFI process.
To my mind, doing this as a SRFI would bring two significant benefits.
1. Quality and breadth of review. I'm sure there are many nits in the
attempt to define a common module API, and a SRFI review would help
to identify and discuss those.
2. Traction/authority. Something like this will only succeed if it
succeeds, if you know what I mean. Getting it approved as a SRFI
would give it a lot more authority and persuade a lot of people
(including myself) that it really was the way to write modules in
future.
Regards,
Neil
_______________________________________________
Chicken-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
