On 9/25/05, Thomas Chust <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Am 25.09.2005, 20:44 Uhr, schrieb Shawn Rutledge > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > [...] > > The "even number of args" requirement is a little odd though. Another > > syntax for this kind of functionality would be > > > > (fn (i . 1) (j . 2)) > > > > which seems more like typical scheme to me, and you don't need the > > special meaning for symbols that end with colon. > > [...] > > Hello, > > the syntax you propose has the disadvantage that you would have to quote > it clumsily like this: > (fn `(i . ,1) `(j . ,2)) > or use a construct like > (fn (cons 'i 1) (cons 'j 2)) > in order to make it really work.
Yep it's hard to implement. _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
