On 9/27/05, Shawn Rutledge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > To have a fully compiled, custom interpreter with non-standard > > syntax, put > > > > (declare (run-time-macros)) > > (include "chicken-more-macros") > > This seems to work, thanks. What are the disadvantages of doing it > this way as opposed to running it in csi?
None, in fact I would prefer csi. What you get is a self-contained executable, though. cheers, felix _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
