Am Dienstag, den 04.10.2005, 14:01 -0500 schrieb Peter Keller: > On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 02:40:42PM -0400, Graham Fawcett wrote: > > On 10/4/05, Will M. Farr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I don't know what Twisted is, but you might have a look at Termite > > > (mentioned in this blog > > > http://patricklogan.blogspot.com/2005/07/termite-lisp-for-distributed- > > > computing.html ); it sounds like what you're talking about done in > > > Gambit-C. > > Hmm.... Twisted has a lot of the same look and feel of E[1]. > > > There's no threading > > overhead, and such a "monolithic, non-blocking" design can handle a > > very large number of concurrent connections, usually scaling better > > than a multithreaded architecture. > > There is another large problem with threaded and, by extension, distributed > programming (languages). > > Reproducability and Debugging.
Sight. ;-) > It is simply a serious nightmare if the above topic was never thought > about in the inception of the codebase. /Jörg _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
