On 10/7/05, Alejandro Forero Cuervo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Well, what I was thinking was of having the Scheme programmer write > > (_ "foo") > > instead of > > "foo". > > Here, _ would be a wrapper to gettext(3), which receives "foo" and > returns the translated string. So it would be activated by the > programmer on a string-by-string basis.
Exactly. Didn't I mention that I have no clue about gettext? ;-) cheers, felix _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
