Is this the current numbers egg? You must have done something wrong. Or is this a cygwin problem? Reloading a shared object won't work in any case.
cheers, felix On 10/12/05, John.Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > felix winkelmann scripsit: > > > Hm... Works fine on this machine. I'll try it on another tonight. > > > > Can someone else reproduce this problem? > > On Version 2, Build 2 - windows-cygwin-x86 - [ dload ], I first got > "Error: (random) bad argument type - not a fixnum: 18446744073709551616" > So I reloaded the numbers egg, and now I get a segfault without even a > message. > > -- > Clear? Huh! Why a four-year-old child John Cowan > could understand this report. Run out [EMAIL PROTECTED] > and find me a four-year-old child. I http://www.ccil.org/~cowan > can't make head or tail out of it. http://www.reutershealth.com > --Rufus T. Firefly on government reports > _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
