Both signatures are correct in the info file. On 11/24/05, Pupeno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thursday 24 November 2005 12:29, you wrote: > > That's odd, the chicken.info file has the correct signature of > > (set-read-syntax! CHAR PROC). > But we are talking about set-dispatch-read-syntax! > -- > Pupeno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (http://pupeno.com) > > >
_______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
