Thanks Raffael. The unit test was for internal use only at the moment and I forgot to fix it. I wrote it when this egg was a port of the Gauche-ObjC bridge. Later I rewrote from scratch but kept the unit test for verification. That particular test is expected to "fail" right now, so no worries. Actually, there are a lot of tests that need to be added.
On 12/13/05, Raffael Cavallaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Dec 13, 2005, at 7:21 AM, felix winkelmann wrote: > > > As it currently happens quite a lot that I forget crucial files, please > > give it a try and tell me whether anything is missing. > It seems to all be there - make in the test directory compiles the > temperature converter cocoa application which runs successfully on my > machine with Mac OS X 10.4.3, and the docs are in the egg too. > > All the tests in /tests/unit-test.scm which are currently implemented pass > save one: > > ;; 14. Null object return is #f > (objc TypeTest returnNullObject) > ;; ==> #<objc-instance #f> > ;; FAILED! Expected: > ;; #f > > > A couple of minor nits - the very first line of unit-test.scm which now > reads: > > (use zobjc testeez typetest) > ^^^^^ > > should probably now read: > > (use objc testeez typetest) > > since the egg has been renamed. > > Similarly, you may want to change the first arg of testeez from > "Gauche-Objective C bridge" to "Chicken-Objective C bridge" or > "Gauche/Chicken-Objective C bridge" or something like that just to avoid > confusion (since I've used both gosh and chicken I thought at first I had > inadvertently run the wrong test suite for a moment!). > > Finally, it might be nice if the setup ran the tests, but maybe this is more > output than the average user wants? > > Thanks again to both of you - this is really nice work! > > > regards, > > Ralph > > Raffael Cavallaro, Ph.D. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
