On 1/19/06, Levi Pearson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > How is returning a c-string from a define-external'd scheme function > supposed to work? Returning the scheme object worked fine in the > end, but it would have been a lot easier if there was some automatic > way.
You are absolutely right, I'll try to fix this in some acceptable way. Currently you can also return a string with '\0' appended, which is done by the internal function `(##sys#make-c-string STRING)'. cheers, felix _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
