No, I do not support a chg. I was just thinking of the text form
abbreviation of Objective-C. Your right, "obj-c:class-name" is more
confusing.
Best Wishes,
Kon
On Jan 21, 2006, at 12:21 PM, Zbigniew wrote:
On 1/21/06, Kon Lovett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
objc:box/unbox instead of objc:wrap/unwrap
That's not a bad idea.
obj-c:* instead of objc:*)?
The "objc" prefix is, near as I can tell, universal in Lisp--OpenMCL,
Gauche--and other implementations---Python, Ruby, even Emacs'
objc-mode---and I think we should stick with that. On a personal
note, I find obj-c:class-name to be more visually confusing than
objc:class-name. Of course, if enough people support a change I will
make it.
_______________________________________________
Chicken-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
