Damn. Malformed patch. My bad. Could everyone send patches as attachment, please? Copy&pasting them sometimes introduce problems with line-terminators, etc.
cheers, felix On 2/9/06, Peter Busser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 07:54:23AM +0100, felix winkelmann wrote: > > On 2/8/06, Peter Busser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > > > The following episode in the ``+'' processing saga: > > > > > > I've delved a bit more in the http egg's innards and it looks like > > > http:canonicalize-string is broken and other functions (such as > > > http:decode-url) dependend on the broken canonicalization function. > > > > > > > I have applied the patch and uploaded the new version. > > No you haven't! Cheater! > > I just downloaded the egg from the web site and checked the code. The > http:decode-url function is still the same and so are http:canonicalize-string > and parse-encoded-arguments. > > Groetjes, > Peter. > > > _______________________________________________ > Chicken-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users > _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
