Re: [Chicken-users] is C_NO_PIC_NO_DLL necessary?

Sun, 12 Feb 2006 23:09:28 -0800

felix winkelmann wrote: 
On 2/13/06, Brandon J. Van Every <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
  
Is C_NO_PIC_NO_DLL really important?  It is used for static libraries,
and Makefile.am has the following notation:

# we add -DC_NO_PIC_NO_DLL seperately so that chicken-config does not
# use -DC_NO_PIC_NO_DLL ... -DC_NO_PIC_NO_DLL is only for libtool
# compiles

    

It's needed to compile statically linked apps on Windows. It's a bit
clunky, but does the job and should not bother the user as long
as he/she is using csc.
So is the comment "-DC_NO_PIC_NO_DLL is only for libtool compiles" wrong then?


Cheers,
Brandon Van Every

_______________________________________________
Chicken-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users

Reply via email to