On 2/16/06, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I had about twenty megs of data on the heap, which was around 100 ms for > a major gc. Now that I've read the docs a bit more, it seems that I've > spoken too soon: allocating all of my srfi-4 stuff as NONGC would cut > down on the heap size considerably. Hmmm, one less reason to not use > Chicken.
Yes, that's what one should do - as Chicken does GC relatively frequently, a heap as big as that will definitely be noticable. cheers, felix _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
