> I am working on TinT (Tint is not Termite), a Chicken specific Termite > workalike. > Alike in the sense that is generally shares syntax & semantics, but I feel > under > no constraint to be 100% faithful. (How could I be, Termite is still > evolving.)
Hurrah! I've actually been lurking on the gambit & chicken lists to see if anyone would try something like this... Has anyone used chicken for multiprocessor systems? I.e. with low-level threading that can take advantage of dual-core systems. (this could be fun to integrate with Henry Baker's EGAL paper (http://home.pipeline.com/~hbaker1/ObjectIdentity.html) and his Cheney-on-the-MTA paper that CHICKEN already implements... for certain values of "fun" :) I know multi-core support is one of Erlang's goals for this-coming year, and there have been some requests on the Gambit list for this lately, but I haven't found too many systems (scheme or otherwise) supporting this "now". cheers, Daniel Faken _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
