On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 11:21:43AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > but I think this question applies to the C compiler your > > using, not to Chicken itself. > > If Chicken produces the same code on both platforms, you are right. > Sven
That's the point of using C instead of assembly. It means you don't have to have several different codebases for all supported architectures. For example, I don't think Felix spent much, if any, time worrying about getting it to compile on PPC based Macintoshes, but it "just works" there. If I'm wrong, please don't hesitate to correct me. :) Regards, Peter -- http://www.student.ru.nl/peter.bex -- "The process of preparing programs for a digital computer is especially attractive, not only because it can be economically and scientifically rewarding, but also because it can be an aesthetic experience much like composing poetry or music." -- Donald Knuth
pgpF62zDX4gKd.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
