Yes, that makes sense. It will be available in the dacs head shortly.
cheers, felix On 3/17/06, Alex Shinn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi! > > Wishlist: the following definitions are reasonable in a Scheme without > imaginary numbers: > > (define (real-part x) x) > (define (imag-part x) 0) > (define magnitude abs) > (define (angle x) 0) > > If these were provided in the core it would be easier to write code > that works regardless of whether or not the numbers egg is being used. > > -- > Alex > > > _______________________________________________ > Chicken-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users > _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
