Am Donnerstag, den 27.04.2006, 07:46 -0400 schrieb John Cowan: > J?rg F. Wittenberger scripsit: > > > The VM of chicken is just neither a single data structure, nor (the even > > worse definition) an executable interpreting some byte sequence. It's a > > calling convention, threads data structure and a few global variables. > > That is to say that Chicken *itself* is a VM; but it is not *implemented*
yes, I would call chicken the implementation of a vm, which executes Scheme > using a VM, unless you want to say that C provides a VM -- which if you > do, don't let me stop you. > _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
