On 5/10/06, Dan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thank you for your suggestions and explanations,
Felix. I managed to get a (repl)-centered executable
to work properly with modules.
One more thing -- does the following declaration refer
to the module-defined f1? I see that when I (display
f1), it has the mangled name mod1$$f1...
;; mod1.scm
(declare (bound-to-procedure f1))
(module mod1 (f1)
(define (f1 x) x))
No, the declare'd f1 will be a different (i.e. non-existant) f1.
It will be possible to do this through hacks, but I wouldn't
worry about this level of optimization.
cheers,
felix
_______________________________________________
Chicken-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
