Graham Fawcett wrote: > All right, I've gotten to the bottom of it. It definitely has to do > with small messages, and has little to do (directly) with Spiffy, > though Spiffy's design (or tcp-server's) does aggravate the problem.
I've only just seen your messages - you might want to investigate the Nagle algorithm, if you haven't already (setsockopt TCP_NODELAY). I've run into it before when doing low-latency, low-bandwidth TCP. Regards, Tony _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
