felix winkelmann wrote:
Ok, on cygwin: what's the name of the bloody library? if autoconf
calls it cygchicken-0, then the cmake build should do the same.
Slavish imitation of Autoconf is bad reasoning. Good reasoning would
be, why do they do cyg-, is it important to do cyg-, are there
well-known other ways to it in the Cygwin universe, what are considered
to be the best practices.
Or, if someone can tell me how to convince cygwin to name the
library libchicken, we can stick to that.
I'll Google about it.
Incidentally, the choices seem to be between having Autoconf broken, and
having Autoconf + CMake broken. I mean, if you had an Autoconf build
that actually worked properly on Cygwin with respect to "csi -R srfi-1",
I'd pay more heed to its nomenclature.
Cheers,
Brandon
_______________________________________________
Chicken-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
