"felix winkelmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote/schrieb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 8/29/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > But I'd like to point out that all this benchmarking mania somewhat > misses the point. ACK. Some performance improvements are only reacheable by replacing general procedures by others, which are specialized in regard to its argument types (fixnum, flonum etc.). I think this lack of polyphormism results in less clear and less maintainable code. Chicken has done the major step in speed improvement: it can be compiled, some other Scheme implementations (which are only interpreters) cannot. Regards Thomas _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
